This weekend is a pause in the mad waltz of the writers’ life marathon; between the kerfuffle-du-jour of Pvt. Beauchamp, the milblogs’ rebel without a clue, and me spending a couple of days at an assortment part-time jobs… and next week when proofs of The Book will be finalized, and I have to start marketing it. Yes!!! It’s nearly here, “To Truckee’s Trail”! Any day now… please buy a copy, when I post the link to Booklocker’s catalogue! I need to buy the software to update my literary website, a decent new printer to generate my own marketing material and letters, and to buy the advertising on websites where they just can’t afford to give it to me out of the goodness of their own hearts and appreciation for my talents as a fairly OK genre fiction writer!
My friend, Dave the Computer Genius has referred me to a handful of his clients who have need of admin-secretarial help a couple of times a week. They are most often small entrepreneurs and hobbyists, who maybe have taught themselves a little with the computer that they bought from Dave to use for their home business, don’t quite understand how to generate what they need and want out of it, and are willing to pay me to come and do it. Or for me to show them how to cut and paste in pictures, pretty up excel spread-sheets, enter useful contact data in their personal scheduling software, and to perform heavy-lifting… like do Google searches. Eh… it’s part-time, pays enough to make going to their workplaces (usually a home office) and leaves me the afternoons to write.
Yeah, writing… still have time to do that. By my calculations, I’m about halfway through “Barsetshire with Cypress Trees – and a Lot of Sidearms”. That is the epic about the German settlements in the Texas Hill Country. Right now, I am plunging into rather interesting territory, with an account of the storms of the Civil War, as they were weathered in Gillespie County. When I talked to my parents on Friday, I was reminded of how interesting, in the sense of the old Chinese saying, that completing this volume is likely to become. One of their circle who they let read all my manuscripts as they are written, is a retired professor of English. She’s a very experienced teacher and editor, and I particularly value her critical feedback. Mom let me know that she has just finished reading the first volume, and has made many, many notes… but that one was a long critique about settler-Indian relations, as I had written about them.
Which… since I am trying to write as accurately as I can about the Texas frontier, circa 1845-1885 means that the opinions and beliefs of the characters that I am writing about are not particularly socially correct by today’s lights. I will not commit the literary sin of “presentism”; that is, putting the attitudes and opinions of a late 20th century person into a 19th century character and either imputing that this person is very brave and non-conformist to be so advanced, or implying that 19th century people were just like us but dressed up in funny costumes and with horses instead of automobiles. Most 19th century Texans hated and feared the Indians; it’s an anachronism to pretend otherwise. There were curious exceptions to this, and all sorts of interesting shadings. Sam Houston and Robert Neighbors were distinguished in their lifetimes for their friendships among various tribes, and for their effective consideration of Indian interests. Members of the Lipan Apache and Tonkawa bands fought alongside Jack Hays’ Ranger companies, and the German settlements negotiated and kept to a peace agreement with the Southern Comanches that was never broken, even though other Indian tribes eventually began raiding at will in the Hill Country. It’s all a great deal more nuanced than someone looking backwards from the late 20th century might give credit for… and I haven’t even gotten to slavery and racial relations, yet. About all I can promise to do is to clean up some of the intemperate language. Which puts me up to the same challenge as Robert Lewis Stephenson, of writing about obscenity-spouting people… without actually using obscenities.
That’s going to be fun, since I am running into all kinds of interesting people and situations, in my first quick pass through Civil War period memoirs and histories. Texas was on the far fringe of the Confederate South. According to one of my notes, the biggest slave owner in the state on the eve of the Civil War owned 300 slaves. The second and third biggest owned far fewer than that… which meant … Off on another track here, which will be reserved for another post.
Bottom line, I am having fun with this. Especially since I have always hated Gone With the Wind, and that romantic lost cause and noble Confederate cavalier crap.




You want “crap” try reading the dribble you post.
Comment by james tumblin — 20070729 @ 1231
Stick around then, James… more dribble to come!
Comment by Sgt. Mom — 20070729 @ 1255
I applaud your resolve to avoid “presentism”. I enjoy reading historical fiction but all too often the characters, who are supposed to be, say, 4th Century Romans, sound and act much more like 20th Century Americans or Britons. Anachronistic and, what is worse, boring!
Look forward to reading your book when it is finished.
Comment by John F. MacMichael — 20070729 @ 1612
Truckee’s coming out soon, eh???? I have a Texas friend, who loves your cooking, who needs a b-day present towards the end of Sept. It’s sounding like she might get an early present this year.
You’ll autograph copies, yes? (obviously that’s more challenging with POD, but we have time to ship it twice)
Comment by AProudVeteran — 20070729 @ 2027
Should be on Booklocker by midweek… It’ll take me a couple of weeks to order copies for myself to send out, but if you order one for your friend, and have it sent it to me with a note or an e-mail alert, I’ll autograph it, and wrap it, and send it on to her!
Comment by Sgt. Mom — 20070729 @ 2038
This data is from the 1860 Census, for Texas, via http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/collections/stats/histcensus
The slaves owned column I estimated by assuming that the average in each “range grouping” was 1/3 from the bottom of the range to the next range. I.e. the average for “20-29″ was 23.33. The next range up was 300-499, and there were none in it.
Cum slaves owned is just a running total, to give a snapshot of the distribution.
Note that there were no 300+ owners, there were 2 200+ owners, and there were 52 100+ owners.
# of # of slaves cum
slaves owners owned slaves
(approx) owned
1 4,593 4,593 4,593
2 2,874 5,748 10,341
3 2,093 6,279 16,620
4 1,782 7,128 23,748
5 1,439 7,195 30,943
6 1,125 6,750 37,693
7 928 6,496 44,189
8 790 6,320 50,509
9 668 6,012 56,521
10+ 2,237 26,098 82,619
15+ 1,186 19,766 102,385
20+ 1,095 25,550 127,935
30+ 491 16,366 144,301
40+ 241 10,443 154,744
50+ 194 10,993 165,737
70+ 88 7,040 172,777
100+ 52 6,933 179,710
200+ 2 466 180,176
Total 21,878 182,566
BTW, county-level data is available at that site. And http://www.mytexasgenealogy.com/tx_maps/tx_cf.htm is a slide-show map of Texas counties from 1834 to the present.
Comment by Rich Rostrom — 20070730 @ 1704