There are a good few reasons besides sheer contrariness that I am standing off to the side, pointing and snickering at the antics of the “global warming” warming crowd. One of them is that I have been to the “omigod-it-could-be-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it” rodeo before. Several times, actually; when I was in junior high school the panic-du-jour was about overpopulation. Eventually we would all wind up, standing shoulder to shoulder, running out of food and clean water. When I got to high school, it was global cooling; great honking ice sheets were going to advance across the earth, the sun would grow dim and we would all freeze to death. If we didn’t starve, first.
Before and during that was the oldie but goodie of global thermonuclear war; we were all going to be annihilated by the Russkies or a melting power plant. Or die of starvation afterwards. For a while in college we were supposed to be all freaked out by the scourge of “future shock” wherein things changed so fast and so suddenly that our poor little minds just couldn’t cope, and we would… oh, I forget what was supposed to happen to us with “future-shock”. Curl up in the fetal position, suck our thumbs and turn up the electric blanket up to high, I suppose.
So, I am a little resistant to someone jumping up and down and screaming “oooga-booga!” and demanding that I panic along with the rest of the lemmings about the latest panic-du-jour. Deal with it.
See, I know the climate of the world has changed, is changing and will go on changing. There were glaciers over the upper Mid-West, once. In Roman times, it was warm enough in England to grow grapes. Until about the 14th century (give or take) it was warm enough in southern Greenland for subsistence farming. A volcano eruption on the other side of the world resulted in a year without a summer early in the 19th century in the northern hemisphere. So it went. So it goes. How much global warming in the last umpty-ump years-decades-whatever is due to human activity? I don’t know, but I am not going to rush into taking a position on the say-so of the same sort of people who were banging on about global cooling, overpopulation, nuclear annihilation, future-shock or whatever in the days of yore.
Sorry. I’ll make jokes about them, though.
Which brings me down to the one over-hyped panic-du-jour that followed upon all the others listed, the one that commanded tabloid-style headlines all during the mid 1980s. That would be the “ritual-satanic-abuse-of-children-in-daycare-centers” scare. While it is not the same kind of issue, it seems to be meriting some of the same kind of popular press. Standing off to one side and looking on, I keep seeing the same sort of shrieking hysteria, the same light-speed jumping to conclusions, the same degree of absolute conviction, the same kind of ‘piling on’, and the same shouting-down of all the people who said “now just wait a darned minute”.
The global-warming trend might very be as real an issue, as much as the day-care ritual abuse wasn’t, but the degree of shrieking hysteria on display when the issue comes up doesn’t do it any favors. Or win me over as a convert, because I am pretty sure that in ten years, the usual suspects will be banging on about something else.




Okay, agreed, pouring tons o’ crap into the air is a bad thing. No arguments there.
My problem with the global warming crowd is two fold.
1. Most of the public statements are along the lines of “Ten scientists agree…” which is a toothpaste commercial, it’s consensus, not scientific method.
2. The websites that you CAN go to for facts, all depend on global warming being true to keep the funding coming in.
It all feels to me like some hippie wrote a paper on global warming and an entire industry has grown up around it.
And you can’t argue with “believers” of global warming any more than you can argue with believers of any other religion because somehow they’ve dedicated great parts of who they are to it.
Of course, if you don’t believe as they believe, then you’re just another, fat, stupid, red-stater who wants his SUV and Triple Whopper.
I giggled my ass off when Canada backed off of Kyoto last week. “Wait, it’s gonna cost us HOW much?”
Comment by Timmer — 20070425 @ 1847
Yeah, global warming is starting to remind me of the “recovered memory” prosecutions of the 1980s. You had a scientific/medical “consensus” that recovered memories were accurate beyond a reasonable doubt. But you never hear about it being used today.
Comment by Bob Hawkins — 20070425 @ 1940
I am not giving up my Hemi Jeep—Period
Comment by Radar — 20070425 @ 2110
… I’ll need it to get out of the way of Al Gore’s carbon footprint should he grace the Midwest with a visit.
Comment by Radar — 20070425 @ 2155
To borrow the old hippie phrase
“Wealth will get you through times of climate change better than climate change will get you though times of no wealth.”
Comment by Brian Dunbar — 20070426 @ 0129