Thirty years ago this weekend, Mom and I were in the supermarket, and in the aisle with the flour and sugar and baking supplies and spices, I took a bottle off the shelf of Schilling brand spices, a cylindrical glass bottle with the light green plastic cap and green and gold label.
“I wonder how much longer we are going to see this?” I showed it to Mom. The label said “Cinnamon” and in smaller letters “Saigon”.
Mom looked at it thoughtfully, and said,
“Get three. We’d better stock up.”
Cinnamon was the only consumer good that we knew of that came out of South Vietnam, and as of the cruel month of April, 1975, there would probably be no more of it.
The North Vietnamese had overrun and taken all of the South. The last helicopter had taken off from the room of the American Embassy, and the newspaper was full of pictures, pictures of frantic people mobbing the gates, crammed into boats, thousands, hundreds of thousands of desperate people, pleading for rescue, for shelter, for succor. Their city was gone, their country was gone. There would be no more jars of “Cinnamon-Saigon” on the grocery store shelves. The war was over, but not the responsibility that seemed to hang— for some people—like an albatross around our necks.
We owed them, and for two years, I got used to taking off my shoes upon entering a home and the arrhythmical sound of English as spoken by Vietnamese, with no “f” or “th” sound and a “p” roughly inserted instead, and a dash of pungent fish sauce on rice and into practically everything else, and small children forgetting that I did not understand Vietnamese and jabbering away at me anyway, and the crackly-crisp texture of spring rolls—a crust like deep-fried tissue paper, but not a drop of oil in the inside, vegetables and bean threads and little bits of pork sausage, and Grandmothers’ vegetable pickles… oh, yes, I may not know Vietnam, but I know the Vietnamese Diaspora. That Diaspora that somehow barely merits a mention on NPR on the occasion of this anniversary; some news reports have mentioned the fact that 2 million Vietnamese decamped in 1975 and the years following, but in all the stories on this solemn occasion I do not hear any of the stories I heard thirty years ago, or any hint of the terror that impelled people like my parent’s foster-son, or my friends Xuan-an and Hai Tran to leave everything… and run.
I am not hearing retellings of the account of the last commercial flight out of Danang, a flight which was mobbed by Vietnamese so desperate that they clawed and trampled each other for a chance to climb onto the rear air-stair of an airliner that didn’t even dare stop, but taxied up and down the ramp with a mob stampeding after it.. I am not hearing any accounts of the USS Hancock, where helicopters were landing so thick and fast it was all they could do to empty out refugees and shove the helicopter overboard because there were two… three… four more helicopters hovering and desperate to land, each crammed full of desperate people. What of the USS Pioneer Contender, where Hai and Xuan-An, and her brother and all their families, and the families of the crew of a coastal patrol launch found brief refuge, at the edge of international waters? What of Hau, the Vietnamese AF mechanic— on a cargo plane which took refuge in Thailand, crammed with Viet Air Force personnel, or Bien, the youngest son of a well-to-do family, who somehow wrangled a visa and way out for him and him alone, so at least one of their blood could be safe, somewhere in the world?
Why are there no stories on NPR about how there was hardly a Vietnamese-American community before 1975, only a scattering of Vietnamese women who had married American men? At a community resettlement committee picnic, to which all the local committees had brought together all the refugees they had taken on responsibility for— and any other resident Vietnamese, as advertised in the local paper— the wife of an American contractor confessed to Xuan-an that she had been reticent to get in touch with any of the refugees until then. She was afraid she would be stigmatized as a former b-girl, or a whore; in fact, she had been a perfectly respectable secretary of a contracting firm in Saigon, and had married her husband with the blessings of her family. Xuan-an teared up and hugged her and said that there was no more any of that, they were now all the same… hopeful refugees in a new land.
I think it was this woman’s husband, who was legendary in the refugee community, who had gone back to Saigon in that cruel April, to bring out her mother and father. If they had a sponsor, they could get a visa, they could leave, so he went personally to fetch them away. He did get the parents out, but he also pledged to sponsor all of her sisters and brothers… and their families… and the families of his in-laws’ immediate neighbors… and six or seven strangers whom he took on, in passing, to the tune of eighty-plus individuals, brands spared from the expected holocaust. The only individual to equal that was the Baptist Vietnamese minister, proprietor of the only Vietnamese restaurant in the San Fernando Valley, and possibly the whole Los Angeles area at that time. It was in a bare-bones and otherwise undistinguishable strip-mall, but it was a restaurant six days of the week, and on the seventh, a church— the cash register perched awkwardly on top of the piano, but Xuan-An’s mother, Grandmother respected him enormously, because he was truly a good and devout man— he was sponsoring other refugees right and left, giving them jobs in the restaurant and setting up dorms in the rooms above. Grandmother was herself a devout Buddhist, and a highly respected arbiter of such matters; as an elder whose immediate family had all managed to escape, she was rather envied by the other elders… most of whom had been carried away because their adult children insisted on it.
Yes, the Vietnamese community in Los Angeles— and a good few other places— sprung into existence almost instantly as these things go, after 1975. This is the story I am not hearing on NPR or in other mainstream news venues, a story I know happened because I was there. I wonder why? The thought occurs to me that it may be that the exodus of all those thousands might be seen as a reproach. All those people on crowded boats and helicopters, all those people mobbing the Embassy, passing their children over the bars, or getting them onto the orphan flights…. It is a reproach, a criticism— even a condemnation of all of those who urged the abandonment of a bad war in a bad place. Every Chablis-and-Brie anti-war intellectual, every campus protestor, every Chomsky-fellow-traveler, every fading movie star or rising politician glomming on to the trendy political position, every bureaucrat with second thoughts about actions they had themselves urged on…they had a hand in pulling the plug on South Vietnam. They have no interest in the stories of people like Xuan-an, and Hai, and Kiet and Bien, and Grandmother, and the guy who went to get his in-laws and returned with eighty other people, and those thousands of other Vietnamese in the great Diaspora… Oh, no, taking account of the stories would mean accepting the responsibility for putting them into the boats, and sending them into exile. We can’t have that, can we?




I sometimes think that since Viet Nam it’s become ‘trendy’ to find one bad incident from a military operation or war, and then play up that incident incessantly until it’s seen as the ‘defining moment’ of the particular war. And it has to be as negative as possible to get the press - positive won’t cut it.
Instead of Saddam’s statue being pulled down in Baghdad, you get Abu Ghraib 24/7.
Instead of the stories of what happened AFTER South Viet Nam fell, you get incessant replays of My Lai on PBS.
No bad news from Afghanistan? Ignore the whole thing. No US atrocities in Bosnia? Well, that’s hardly newsworthy.
And OTHER ‘organizations’ get a complete pass.
If WW2 had been covered like this, then BBC NEWS | UK | Tragic D-Day rehearsal remembered would have been the defining moment, not the operation itself or the sucesses which followed.
I swear, the phrase “Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it” hits it on the nose. It’s like removing safety warnings from a manintenance manual on equipment that can hurt or kill you if the warnings aren’t heeded.
Rewriting history to avoid inconvenient facts doesn’t do anyone a damn bit of good, and the temporary salve of forgetfulness is washed off by the tears of the victims when it happens again.
J.
Comment by JLawson — 20050430 @ 2250
I did actually see a couple of short stories on FNC, but that’s all. Mom, you really brought back some memories, sounds I can still hear, and smells that have never left my nostrils! I had no idea that any of that stuff was still with me, as strong as it is.
This reminds me of the day we came home from the UK at the end of Desert Storm. 18 C-130’s, flying over the AF Academy, over Colorado Springs, Fort Carson, and Peterson AFB before landing and shutting down all engines at once.
The party they threw for us in the hangar, yellow ribbons everywhere, hugs from everybody, music, food, love from the community, and the great sobs that hit me when I remembered the lack of homecoming after Vietnam.
I was embarrassed, and so surprised, I had no idea that I was carrying any baggage after all those years! I was in total shock, and all of a sudden I realized that I’m still not ready to visit the wall, and probably never will be.
Comment by Joe Comer — 20050430 @ 2340
I teach many Vietnamese students at my High School. I share with them my experiences as a child of a Airmen who served in the Vietnam War. I tell them about many aspects of the war not covered in the MSM or MSM history books. They are grateful and share their families experiences too. They are great kids and have a tremendous respect for our country.
Comment by Ben Bauman — 20050501 @ 0833
NPR makes an annual gloat of the fall of Saigon. Come June 18 they bewail the execution of Judith and Ethel Rosenberg. Each year is the same. They are the stereotypes of the leftist media. Some good programming on a plate smothered in the onions of Marxism.
Comment by gdgadfly — 20050501 @ 1846
It may be forgotten for reasons similar to those that cause Children’s Crusade to go unnumbered, but talk about the Vietnamese diaspora should probably mention the babylift. http://www.vietnambabylift.org/
Comment by James Agenbroad — 20050502 @ 0650
I am sorry I missed it but I am sure that Jane Fonda probably talked about it on her recent TV interview and how the efforts of Herself and John Kerry made it such a success.
Comment by Chief — 20050502 @ 1732
Not sure I understand the problem, to be honest. Of course these guys were scrambling to get on the last plane or helicopter; there was a pretty good chance they were going to get executed or “re-educated” as collaborators if they didn’t. I spoke to a few cyclo drivers during a recent holiday in Saigon, and they all told me the same thing - when Saigon fell, they were terrified and tried to get out. Those who didn’t either died or were sent away for years.
Did America present them with the opportunity of a better life? Sure, of course it did. But that wasn’t top of their agenda when they were trying to get on the helicopter.
Incidentally, in a magnificent bit of political thinking, once the Communist Party took control they re-educated the teachers, lecturers, lawyers, doctors and so on - basically everyone with an education (and who could therefore speak English) and now they only allow them to…drive cyclos and talk to tourists! It’s hilarious; almost every driver I got in my all too few weeks there spent their time telling me about their re-education and how the Communists are basically a bunch of “old men who piss the wrong way in the wind” (actual quote)
Anyway, it’s becoming capitalist thanks to Adam Smith rather than Richard Nixon. Just took a while longer, that’s all.
I am slightly curious, however, as to why you think this is a big story that’s being missed. A bunch of immigrants find a better life in America? That’s a 300 year old story with not much new to add. The world’s most powerful military power beaten by a bunch of peasants? Of course that’s an amazing story. As the best storyteller on this site (or indeed most of the others I read) I’m a bit bemused that the dramatics escape you.
Comment by Al — 20050503 @ 0930
Because I am not hearing anything much about this part of it on the media that I listen to. It’s just a non-story, apparently. They did a travelogue of present-day Vietnam, with the obligitory flogging of the My Lai massacre… and then not another word. Not anything about the baby/orphan flights out, not a word of all those dramatic exits on the last day, nothing about the mobs at the embassy, nothing about those people who moved heaven and earth to get people away. Certainly nothing about the two million who came away in 1975 and afterwards who basically had the clothes they stood up in… and thirty years later they have their own houses, businesses, children on college. Nope, nothing to see here, move along.
Comment by Sgt. Mom — 20050503 @ 0954
Just a footnote here, but there were a few Vietnamese in the U.S. before 1975 that were not married to Americans. My 8th-grade class of 25-30 had two Vietnamese kids back in 1966-67. That was at the Catholic grade school in Pacific Grove, California, and their fathers both taught at the Defense Language Institute. They had been village chiefs in Viet Nam, but had left because the Viet Cong was assassinating village chiefs. (Just one reason why I was never much tempted to demonstrate against the war and never at all in any way tempted to cheer for the Viet Cong.)
It was a very multicultural school. The Slovenian kid’s father was also at the DLI. There was no demand for Slovenian classes, but they kept him around as a librarian because Slovenia was (part of) a Communist country and they figured they might need him some day and he would be hard to replace. I imagine they put him in the classroom when Yugoslavia started to break up.
Comment by Dr. Weevil — 20050503 @ 1925