<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin and Charlie Gibson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/</link>
	<description>Military Musings and Thoughts Less Filtered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AProudVeteran</title>
		<link>http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/#comment-533463</link>
		<dc:creator>AProudVeteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/#comment-533463</guid>
		<description>Newsbusters has a link to a transcript of the unedited interview. It&#039;s very interesting when compared to the edited version.  They&#039;ve highlighted some of it. You might want to check it out.

http://tinyurl.com/3nolj7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newsbusters has a link to a transcript of the unedited interview. It&#8217;s very interesting when compared to the edited version.  They&#8217;ve highlighted some of it. You might want to check it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3nolj7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3nolj7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Dunbar</title>
		<link>http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/#comment-533403</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Dunbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/#comment-533403</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>is just another example of McSame’s incompetence to be president. </i></p>
<p>A lame insult as a substitute for saying anything meaningful usually indicates a vacuity in the brain housing group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveH</title>
		<link>http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/#comment-533395</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 03:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/#comment-533395</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; tell us what the &quot;Bush Doctrine&quot; is?

Pick one, and your interviewer can probably say *bzzzt!*, &quot;you&#039;re wrong, sorry&quot;.

For starters, look at the Wikipedia (yeah, yeah; might as well start somewhere) entry for &quot;Bush Doctrine&quot;, which starts out:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
The Bush Doctrine is a term used to describe the foreign policy doctrine of United States president George W. Bush, enunciated in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks. It may be viewed as a set of several related foreign policy principles, including stress on ending terrorism, spreading democracy, increased unilateralism in foreign policy and an expanded view of American national security interests. Foreign policy experts argue over the meaning of the term &quot;Bush Doctrine,&quot; and some scholars have suggested that there is no one unified theory underlying Bush&#039;s foreign policy. Jacob Weisberg identifies six successive &quot;Bush Doctrines&quot; in his book The Bush Tragedy, while former Bush staffer Peter D. Feaver has counted seven.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For all practical purposes, in an interview it means whatever the interviewer says it means.

Sort of like Humpty Dumpty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t <i>you</i> tell us what the &#8220;Bush Doctrine&#8221; is?</p>
<p>Pick one, and your interviewer can probably say *bzzzt!*, &#8220;you&#8217;re wrong, sorry&#8221;.</p>
<p>For starters, look at the Wikipedia (yeah, yeah; might as well start somewhere) entry for &#8220;Bush Doctrine&#8221;, which starts out:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The Bush Doctrine is a term used to describe the foreign policy doctrine of United States president George W. Bush, enunciated in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks. It may be viewed as a set of several related foreign policy principles, including stress on ending terrorism, spreading democracy, increased unilateralism in foreign policy and an expanded view of American national security interests. Foreign policy experts argue over the meaning of the term &#8220;Bush Doctrine,&#8221; and some scholars have suggested that there is no one unified theory underlying Bush&#8217;s foreign policy. Jacob Weisberg identifies six successive &#8220;Bush Doctrines&#8221; in his book The Bush Tragedy, while former Bush staffer Peter D. Feaver has counted seven.
</p></blockquote>
<p>For all practical purposes, in an interview it means whatever the interviewer says it means.</p>
<p>Sort of like Humpty Dumpty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxie</title>
		<link>http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/#comment-533350</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ncobrief.com/index.php/archives/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson/#comment-533350</guid>
		<description>I was actually surprised that Gibson asked her hard hitting questions. I didn&#039;t find him condescending in anyway. Palin tried to bluff, lie and skirt addressing the issues through most of the interview. Gibson tried his best to hold her feet to the fire. It became quite obvious she is an accomplished liar and opportunist. 

There is no way in hell this woman is fit to run for office at the national level. By choosing her to be his running mate, is just another example of McSame&#039;s incompetence to be president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually surprised that Gibson asked her hard hitting questions. I didn&#8217;t find him condescending in anyway. Palin tried to bluff, lie and skirt addressing the issues through most of the interview. Gibson tried his best to hold her feet to the fire. It became quite obvious she is an accomplished liar and opportunist. </p>
<p>There is no way in hell this woman is fit to run for office at the national level. By choosing her to be his running mate, is just another example of McSame&#8217;s incompetence to be president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

